Chicago Birth Injury Lawyer Blog

The Sacramento Bee reported this week on a new jury verdict in a birth injury lawsuit. As each Chicago birth injury lawyer at our firm has explained often, the verdicts in these cases are often higher than in other cases because of the long-term consequences of these particular injuries. Of course, each case is unique and decisions are made on an individual basis. However, children hurt at birth usually need long-term care, special equipment, special therapy, and often have advanced medical needs for decades. All of that has a cost that is reflected in any jury verdict if liability is found.

In this latest case, a $78.5 million verdict was handed down by a jury after finding that a child’s brain injury was caused by medical negligence. The child is now three years old. His family claimed that he has severe spastic quadriplegia as a result of errors made during his birth.

The case centers on the 2008 birth of the boy. The child’s mother was 36 weeks pregnant went she went to the hospital with signs of placental abruption. This is the separation of the placenta from the uterus wall—it occurs before a baby is delivered. The placenta is the organ that provides necessary nourishment to the fetus. In response to the issue the doctor performed an ultrasound when fetal monitoring was not conclusive in explaining the situation.

However, according to the lawsuit, the ultrasound was performed using outdated equipment that was not properly maintained. According to information presented during the trial, the ultrasound equipment was not sensitive enough to detect what was necessary. Amazingly, information indicated that the equipment had not even been serviced in ten years. The manual for the equipment indicated that annual maintenance was necessary to ensure the piece of equipment performed as necessary. Each Illinois birth injury lawyer at our firm understands that medical care providers are only as good as their equipment sometimes, and so proper maintenance of that equipment must be paramount.

As a result of using the faulty equipment the involved doctor did not detect a fetal heartbeat. That led him to tell the mother that the child had died. However, the child was not dead. It wasn’t until an hour and twenty minutes later that it was discovered that the child was actually alive. An emergency C-section was performed. However, the extreme delay in delivering the child had severe consequences—the baby was born with a brain injury.

Unfortunately, the doctor in this case maintained an obstinate attitude throughout the proceeding. The doctor maintained that the child was actually dead when the ultrasound was performed but that the boy “came back to life” 81 minutes later.

In reality, the plaintiff argued that the baby was not dead, but the poor ultrasound equipment reading led to the confusion. An actual ultrasound technician had to be called in from home to check the results. It was only then that the results were discovered to be incorrect, leading to the discovery that the child was still alive and the emergency delivery.

See Our Related Blog Posts:

Dramatic Rise in Cesarean Births

Report Finds Recent Rise in C-Section Births

Each Illinois birth injury lawyer at our firm knows that when it comes to childbirth timing is often a crucial element of proper care. Of course birth is a delicate process and when things go well, the child is born on schedule without specific emergencies. However, there are circumstances when a child facing health problems while still in the womb. This can occur in many ways, such as when oxygen is deprived to the baby or the child gets positioned incorrectly in the womb.
At these times, when things do not go according to plan, the skill and efficiency of the medical team is most needed. Yet, unfortunately the response at these times in inadequate. Serious birth injuries often result. When that happens it may be appropriate to seek out a birth injury lawyer to see if a lawsuit might be appropriate to seek redress and accountability.

That is what happened in a case that was recently profiled involving a birth injury where a doctor failed to deliver a child in a timely way which ultimately had serious repercussions. According to the court documents, the child was born in late January over six years ago. Complications developed during the birth. Specifically, the delivery involved an umbilical cord prolapsed and a nuchal cord. Our Chicago birth injury lawyers are very familiar with these delivery complications. Umbilical cord prolapse occurs when the umbilical cord exits the uterus before the child. It is an emergency and requires quick action to keep the child safe. A nuchal cord refers to the situation where the umbilical cord wraps around the fetus’s neck.

In this case the doctors should have been aware of the problem early on. The mother and child’s vital signs indicated problems, and the mother complained of a headache so severe that her vision became blurred. Unfortunately, many of these warning signs were not identified in a timely manner. As a result the child was born with severe injuries. He has mild cerebral palsy, is blind, and is unable to speak. His severe developmental delays will require significant treatment.

A lawsuit was filed by the family alleging negligence. Recently the suit was settled before the need to go to trial with the defendant agreeing to pay more than $4 million to the family. The funds will be used to provide the close care that the child will need throughout his life.

Our attorneys are very families with the exact issues in these cases. Issues like umbilical cord prolapsed are not common, but they occur enough that medical professionals should be aware of the appropriate responses to them. Sometimes that does not happen. Often it is appropriate for the practitioner to try to reduce the pressure on the cord and spur vaginal delivery as soon as possible. When this fails it is often necessary for an emergency C-section to be performed. In any event, time is critical in these situations. Failure to act quickly leads to oxygen deprivation which can cause brain damage and even death.

See Our Related Blog Posts:

Breech Delivery Births Rarely Taught in Medical Schools

Jury Awards $58 Million to Family of Birth Injury Victim

Vaginal births after C-sections (VBACs) are a hot topic in the world of childbirth these days. On one hand, the current C-section rates have been rising over the past few decades, reaching a point (between 30-40% of all births) that most agree is far too high. C-section are most expensive and more risky than healthy vaginal births. Performing these unnecessarily is therefore not a good scenario. However, on the other hand there situations where doctors are unsure if it is safe to have a vaginal birth instead of a C-section. Our Illinois birth injury lawyers appreciate that VBACs lie at the heart of that debate. VBACs are births involving women who have had a previous child delivered via C-section. There is disagreement about the increased risks of a birth injury when VBACs are performed.

A new study was recently published at PLOS Journal involving examination of the true risk of VBACs. The overall results are slightly muddled but indicate that women who have a vaginal birth after that have previous had a C-section are at a slightly higher risk of having some complications during their pregnancy and birth. This conclusion was reached by experts from the University of Adelaide in Australia.

The study examined over 2,300 women who had previously given birth via C-section. Of that group, slightly more than half chose to have a vaginal birth, while the remaining mothers had another C-section birth. None of the participating mothers in any group had previously had other complications, such as premature births. Therefore, all of the 2,300 participants were considered reasonable candidates for VBACs. No doubt the results might have been different if other factors were involved, such as mothers who had complications in the earlier birth.
What did they find?

Overall, there were no serious differences between the groups. There were no maternal deaths in any of the groups. However, there were two stillbirths in the vaginal birth group—the causes of those stillbirths are unknown. The researchers admit that overall there was little difference between the groups. The only main finding was that those mothers who had a VBAC were more likely to have a serious hemorrhage during the process which often required a blood transfusion. In addition, while 2.3% of children born vaginally suffered various neonatal problems, only 1% of the C-section group had those problems.

Our Illinois birth injury attorneys appreciate that these findings are difficult to parse out. While small it is undeniable that VBACs come with a bigger risk of infant or fetal death. However, the effect is small. In addition, the hemorrhaging issue is a concern, but that did not lead to maternal death or other seemingly serious complications.

At the end of the day, this research is likely another bit of information that should be incorporated into discussions between mothers and doctors about the best course of action in their specific situation. It is impossible for these sorts of decisions to be made on a blanket-basis, because one size certainly does not fit all. No matter what choice is made, however, medical professionals must ensure that they abide by reasonable standards of care to ensure risks of birth injuries are minimized.

See Our Related Blog Posts:

The Financial Savings of Curbing C-Sections

Doctor Joins in Call to Limit C-Section Use

Our Illinois birth injury lawyers have frequently shared information about concerns regarding the rising C-section rates. Many medical professionals have indicated that the current C-section rates are alarmingly high, particularly considering the increased risks in surgical births and the significant cost increases. Many hospitals have been working to figure out ways to cut down on the rates. However, finding a solution is not easy. On certain occasions C-sections are absolutely necessary for the health and well-being of the mother and child. Of course, it may be medical malpractice not to perform a C-section in those situations. Yet, that does not mean that it is proper to perform these procedures at any time.

A recent article from the Journal-Review touched on the topic. The story explains how C-sections are now the nation’s most common surgical procedure. More than 1.4 million of these surgical births occur across the country each year. At that rate roughly 33% of births nationwide are C-section. The rate is higher in some parts of the country, and the overall rate represents essentially the highest level ever. Over the last ten to fifteen years that rate has increased by 73% according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Our Chicago birth injury attorneys appreciate that if each of those surgical births were necessary for the health of the mother or child then the rates wouldn’t necessarily be that alarming. However, many suggest that those C-sections are not necessary. That is why some support groups are springing up which are geared toward helping women reach the important decision about their optimal birthing method. Many of these groups involve the sharing of information about how to realize a natural birth.

At times the group members share stories about situations where C-sections were performed unnecessarily. For example, at a recent meeting of one of these groups a woman explained that her pregnancy was going well. She was 24, did not have any complications, and was working as a receptionist and photographer up until she was 36 weeks pregnant. Near her due date she began feeling slight contractions, and so she went to the local hospital. The woman reports that she knew that she was not in full labor, but she wanted to go check and see what was going on anyway.

A nurse monitored the woman’s condition and explained that everything was fine. The baby’s heart was without complications and there was no indication of fetal distress. However, the woman was surprised to find that instead of being sent home, the doctor on duty (not her own doctor) wanted her to be induced. The woman and her husband expressed their preference to go home and wait for labor. However, the nurses advised the family against it, noting that if they did so, they would be liable for any complications.

The woman was given drugs which sped up contractions slightly. However, after a few hours the doctor decided to perform a C-section because of the woman’s “failure to progress.” The mother explains that she believes that at the end of the day the operation was performed for the doctor’s convenience. Our Chicago birth injury lawyers know that this is never an appropriate factor in medical decision-making. In this case, it likely led to the woman undergoing a serious, and unnecessary abdominal surgery. We advise all local families to be aware of these concerns and potential issues.

See Our Related Blog Posts:

Dramatic Rise in Cesarean Births

Report Finds Recent Rise in C-Section Births

As reported late last week by Reuters, a new study is suggesting that unnecessary C-section procedures increase medical care by $2 billion every year worldwide. As the Illinois birth injury lawyers at our firm have often noted, the problem is particularly potent here in the United States. Estimates suggest that over the last few decades C-section rates have steadily increased. They now roughly account for about 1/3 of all U.S. births—the highest rate of all time.

Of course, perhaps most importantly, unnecessary C-sections create unnecessary risks for patients. Obviously there are situations where C-sections are absolutely essential. In fact, many Illinois birth injury lawsuits arise when medical teams fail to act reasonably to perform a C-section in a timely fashion in response to fetal distress or trauma. However, there are other situations where a C-section is not actually necessary. It should never be forgotten that C-sections are serious abdominal surgeries that come with inherent risks. Many mothers have developed infections or have suffered extreme blood loss as a result of these procedures. In addition, having a C-section can lead to problems in subsequent pregnancies. Placenta abnormalities are common in subsequent births which can lead to severe labor bleeding.

On top of the increased medical risks, unnecessary C-section also comes at a high cost. It is simply much more expensive to have a surgical birth than a vaginal birth. Cost savings are always a hot topic, particularly because tightening personal and public budgets. Spending money unnecessarily on healthcare costs should be avoided.

What is responsible for the rising C-section rates? Various possible explanations have been offered. One innocuous reason may be an increase in multiple births. Twins and other multiple births quite frequently have to be delivered via C-section. The more multiple births, the more C-sections. However, perhaps a more potent reason is that more mothers are requesting the surgical birth in order to avoid labor or have more control over the time of birth. This follows the trend of induced labors of all stripes becoming more common.

Our Chicago birth injury lawyers appreciate that there are various different approaches that might be able to lower the C-section rates. For example, many doctors suggest that perhaps the best way to do that is by limiting first C-sections. Because mothers who have one C-section usually have surgical births for all subsequent children, avoiding the first child being born surgically might go a long way to addressing the problem. Meeting that goal, in turn, requires limits of the use of induced labor only to those cases where it is medically necessary.

In addition, many doctors suggest that there should be resurgence in vaginal births after C-section” (VBACs). There remains a stigma and unnecessary fear associated with giving birth vaginally after already having a C-section. However, many doctors explain that there are many women who could successful give birth vaginally. Unfortunately, for staffing reasons many hospitals do not even offer VBACs, essentially limiting the mother’s option and making it harder to actually lower the C-section rate in many locations.

See Our Related Blog Posts:

Dramatic Rise in Cesarean Births

Report Finds Recent Rise in C-Section Births

The Illinois birth injury lawyers at our firm appreciate that surgical births are seemingly always a hot topic in the medical community. For years the rate of birth that ultimately ended in a C-section crept higher and higher. This was alarming to many because, though surgical births are necessary in certain emergency situations, they come with increased risks of birth injury harm to mother and child. Therefore, the overall harm might increase if unnecessary C-sections were performed.

These concerns have led many hospitals to institute a range of goals in order to get the C-section rate down. For example, the Lund Report this week posted a story on how one hospital is trying to get its own rate down. The facility is tracking its surgical birth rate on a month-by-month basis to closely identify any trends. Nationwide, according to the March of Dimes, 25.2% of all childbirths are C-sections. Other studies have found that rate to actually be higher. The particular hospital engaged in this tracking program has found that its own rate is slightly lower, at 21.7%. Some facilities across the country have reported surgical birth rates as high as 45-50%. Overall, the United States has the highest C-section rate of any developed country in the world.

Lowering C-section rates can be difficult, because each decision has to be made on a case by case basis. If complications develop, C-sections are often absolutely essential. Failure to conduct a timely C-section in certain situations can be malpractice. That is why the main efforts at lowering the rate involve things like talking to mothers about the potential benefits of having a vaginal birth after they have already had a C-section with a previous child. These births, known as VBACs, once fell out of favor but are once again being championed by many.

In general, the facility explains that they are working on lowering the rate by individually discussing each C-section that was performed after the fact to understand why it was performed and whether changes in the future might allow a different outcome. The hospital attributes some of its success in the “Hawthorne Effect.” When doctors know that their C-section rate is being monitored, they might not be so quick to recommend a C-section when it isn’t absolutely necessary.

From the legal perspective, there is not necessarily a right or wrong answer when it comes to the appropriate rate of C-section use. Our Chicago birth injury lawyers appreciate that the law looks at each case individually. In other words, all that matters in a birth injury lawsuit is: what conduct was reasonable, what conduct was actually exhibited, and whether that conduct caused harm. In many individual cases that may mean that a C-section birth should have been performed that was not. The fact that some doctors are working to lower the rate C-section overall is of no consequences in that individual legal determination. Conversely, an unnecessary surgical birth may be performed that leads to damaging consequences for the mother and child. While less common, that situation may also result in a suit if the harm could have been prevented had a reasonable medical care been provided.

See Our Related Blog Posts:

Dramatic Rise in Cesarean Births

Report Finds Recent Rise in C-Section Births

Each Illinois cerebral palsy lawyer at our firm has worked closely with families raising a child with CP; we understand the day-to-day challenges faced. The condition occurs along a spectrum, and it is a mistake to lump any Illinois cerebral palsy victim together when describing the effects of the cognitive and physical injury. Like every other child, those with cerebral palsy have the potential to do great things in life and impact for the better all those around them. However, that is not to say that these children face do not face certain challenges that other children do not. For that reason, it is important for medical experts to continue working on ways to limit the prevalence of cerebral palsy—understanding how it develops and why so that future children can be spared the challenges.

For example, this week U.S. Legal News published a story that reports on a new study which found a link between premature C-section births and increased risk of cerebral palsy. The study, conducted by researchers at Johns Hopkins University and Yale University was presented at the annual meeting of the Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine. We touched on this same issue in a post earlier this week. The authors found that contrary to the beliefs of some, C-section births for premature infants were no safer than vaginal birth. In fact, the C-section births might come with a whole host of increased birth injury risks, including complications like cerebral palsy.

When talking about the issues on the “Today Show” recently, the NBC Chief Medical Editor touched on the study and shared a bit more information about the findings. She noted that the researchers said that when taking all medical complications into account, premature infants who were born via C-section had a 30 percent increase in chance of suffering a birth injury. The specific form of the complications varied, but they involved things like feeding and breathing challenges, temperature control problems, and jaundice. In fact, the issues were found to have the potential to worsen over time—increasing the risk of long-term complications leading to severe cognitive and physical challenges, like those faced by children with cerebral palsy.

The problems are most prone to affect premature infants, because they are less developed. Experts in the area have found that it is actually in the last few weeks of the gestation that the child’s most critical organs—like the lungs and the brain—are developing quickly. Therefore, taking the child out of the mother’s womb before that full development presents obvious risks to the child. Developmental problems, including a whole host of learning disabilities and developmental problems are risked when a child is taken from a mother prematurely via C-section.

This counteracts some claims by doctors who believe that C-sections should be performed on infants who are growing at a slower rate in the womb. These doctors suggest that treating the premature child in ICU is preferable to allowing the slow development to continue in the womb. However, this latest finding suggests otherwise. All doctors should be aware of this work and make medical decisions with the findings in mind.

See Our Related Blog Posts:

Cerebral Palsy Primer: What It Is & When It Arises

Birth Injury Lawsuit Filed After Child Born with Cerebral Palsy

Are Cesarean section births always advisable when it is known that a baby will be born premature? In the past, doctors seemingly always advised patients to have the surgical births in these situations, because it was assumed that birth injuries and complications were minimized in those situations. However, a new study reported by MSNBC’s Health Today suggests that might not be the case. Each Chicago birth injury attorney at our firm was interested to read that the study finding suggest that C-sections may not be safer than regular vaginal births for the most fragile preterm children. In fact, this particular study suggests that the surgical births could lead to more complications in infants, including respiratory problems.

The story draws on research that was presented at the annual meeting of the Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine. Those presenting the findings suggest that they necessitate a re-thinking of the merit of C-sections in certain situations. The findings were presented by a professor of gynecology and obstetrics at the Johns Hopkins School of Medicine.

These research results fly in the face of current practices. According to the most recent data available, from 2009, about 46% of premature babies were delivered via C-section. Those born a few weeks later (37-39 weeks of gestation), have C-section rates that were ten percent lower. The discrepancy is usually explained by the fact that vaginal birth might be too traumatic for the most fragile infants. However, the new study suggests otherwise. After analyzing the medical records of more than 2,500 babies born prematurely over an eight year period they found that more than 55% had been delivered via C-section. But they didn’t find health benefits for the surgical births. Those born vaginally were no more likely to develop problems. In fact, C-section births led to increased risk of respiratory distress syndrome—a condition that may have long-term effects on the infant, often turning into asthma.

Blog readers are familiar with the current debate raging around the overuse of C-section births. Our Illinois birth injury lawyers have shared information from many sources which suggests that the rising use of C-sections is not only unnecessary (and costly) but actually more dangerous for mothers and infants. As one commentator noted of the situation, “The rates of C-sections are going up in this country. One reason may be in vitro fertilization and multiple births. One part of it, though, is women trying to put delivery on their own schedules. And, you’ve heard this before: ‘too posh to push.’”

We understand that there are no easy answers to apply in all cases. When it comes down to it, every decision must be an individual one between a mother and her doctor about what is best considering each factor unique to their particular case. As with all medical care, it is helpful for families to be as fully engaged in the process as possible. That involves asking questions, seeking explanations, and ensuring that their medical professional is not just “going through the motions” but actually making the best choice in their specific case.

See Our Related Blog Posts:

Dramatic Rise in Cesarean Births

Report Finds Recent Rise in C-Section Births

The rise in C-section births continues to raise alarm bells among all those interested in preventing Illinois birth injuries. Our Chicago birth injury lawyers know that it can be a tricky issue, because there are times when the surgical birth is absolutely necessary to save the life of a child or mother. However, the fact that they are necessary some of the time does not at all mean that they are safer all of the time. The truth is that on the whole these surgical births are far riskier than natural childbirth, and they should not be undertaken when not necessary.

Yet, there seems to be a notion that cesarean section births are simply one choice that mothers can make without much effect on medical risks one way or another. As we reported last week, the shockingly high maternal mortality rate in the United States is likely caused in part by the rising use of C-section birth—upwards of 50% of all births in some locations.

Interestingly, a new study summarized in Top News found that doctors likely bear much of the blame for the rise in C-section use. Some had previously argued that the rise was likely due to mothers who wanted to avoid the pain of childbirth and instead go with the “easier” C-section option. But the results of a new study found that not to be the case. The research included analysis of the births for 22,000 women over a two year period. Researchers found that more than half of those who had cesarean section births did so because their doctors told them to, not because they preferred it to natural childbirth.

This raises a range of questions about what exactly is leading doctors to push for more C-section births.

Of course, any Chicago medical malpractice lawyer knows that the finger will first point to medical malpractice lawsuits. As is usually the case, some in the medical community try to tie any and all problems with the medical system back to groups not actually in the medical community—namely lawyers. Finger pointing is nothing new when it comes to certain industry’s shifting blame, but it particularly damaging here because lives are on the line.

Lawyers are not in the delivery rooms and have zero influence on what happens in any individual case. Instead, in each case lawyers are only involved the fact when a patient has been hurt because they received treatment below a reasonable level of care. That standard of care is based on what other prudent practitioners would do when faced with the similar circumstances. Obviously there are no rules that dictate whether or not one is immune from liability because they perform a c-section birth. Instead, the law is simply asks doctors to act in reasonable ways considering the information that is in front of them. Sometimes that might be to encourage a c-section, at other time it might not be. In most cases the decision will involve the weighing of the risks with the potential benefits. There is no inherent reason why this weighing of the factors should be skewed by the civil justice system and force doctors to make poor decisions when it comes to advising on c-section risks.

See Our Related Blog Posts:

Dramatic Rise in Cesarean Births

Report Finds Recent Rise in C-Section Births

This weekend we published a story on the tragic death of a mother who passed aware after having a C-section birth with twins. A father remained heartbroken as he shared the story of watching his wife slip away mere hours after giving birth shortly after Thanksgiving. We explained how the story highlighted the fact that while “birth injuries” usually refer to problems that arise in a young child during delivery, they just as well can apply to serious injuries experienced by the mother during these traumatic births. There is no way around that fact that there are inherent risks in all childbirths, and those risks are magnified when the medical providers involved fail to act appropriately in any given situation.

A Fox News report this weekend on the same story took a different angle, and used the tragedy to remind readers that C-Section births present even more inherent risks than natural childbirths. The ubiquity of these surgical deliveries gives many a false sense of security—in some areas upwards of 40% of all babies are delivered surgically. However, the possibility of C-section complications are very real; lives are literally on the line every time one of these procedure is performed. It is important that all families (and medical professionals) keep those risks in mind as they make decisions about whether or not C-section births are appropriate in their situation.

As the husband involved in the latest tragedy explained, his wife showed zero signs of distress leading up to the procedure. The only seeming irregularity was that the surgery was moved up one day, because doctors found that the woman’s blood pressure was elevated in a pre-op appointment. The birth itself actually went fine, but the woman began to hemorrhage after the surgery. She did not survive the childbirth injury.

As the Fox News story explained, when hearing about that event many readers admitted disbelief that mothers are exposed to such risks when giving birth in this day and age. Considering that medical improvements have advanced to the point where the vast majority of birth complications are resolved, it is not surprising that community members underestimate the continuing childbirth risks. This is particularly true of surgical births.

Just like any other surgery—there are significant risks involved. Opening up the human body and performing any action, let alone the extraction of a new baby, is a complex procedure that places significant stress on the body. Every time a surgery is performed, that stress may result in any number of problems or surgical errors. Depending on the severity of the problem and the skill with which the medical providers respond to the problem, there can be significant consequences for the patient.

In the context of C-section births, doctors explain that bleeding is far and away the most common cause of death for the mother. Following the procedure the bleeding can be fast and severe. At times the speed of the bleeding is so significant that there is nothing medical professionals can do to save the patient. In addition, C-sections can also lead to bladder complications, bowel injuries, and infections. Blood clots are also possible which themselves can cause pulmonary embolisms—the blockage of a main lung artery.

See Our Related Blog Posts:

Dramatic Rise in Cesarean Births

Report Finds Recent Rise in C-Section Births

Over the past few weeks our birth injury lawyers have discussed the myriad of concerns about the rise in C-section rates in the United States. Many advocates have voiced concerns over the steady increase in use of these procedures, noting that many surgeries may simply be unneeded. Rates in some places were anywhere from 40-45% of all births with some speculating the rates may actually rise over 50% in the future. It remains shocking to many that more than one out of every two births would be C-section procedures.

However, new data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and reported in The Stir, suggests that the C-section rate in the United States has actually gone down for the first time in a decade and a half. According to the CDC data, the 2010 C-section rate nationwide was 32.8 percent, the year before the rate was a tenth of a percent larger at 32.9 percent. Before this very slight decrease the rates have risen steadily every single year since 1996.

According to the story, it remains unclear exactly what led to the stabilization of these C-section rates over the last year. It could be that elective C-sections have decreased as community members have become more aware of the inherent harm in the surgery. Or, in the alternative, the reduction could come from those C-sections deemed medically necessary. It could also be a combination of both. In either case, the reduction is being considered a welcome bit of news for those who have long worried about the steady increase in the procedures.

The article’s author, a mother who has had two C-sections, explained, “Undergoing and recovering from a C-section is no picnic. C-sections carry a much higher risk than vaginal deliveries of complications for both mother and child.” Breathing problems are far more common for infants delivered surgically. Similarly, mothers are open to increased risks of inflammation, infections and uterus injuries when they have these procedures. This is not counting the fact that C-sections increase risks of complications in all future pregnancies. Of course there are situations where C-sections are absolutely necessary to prevent problems for both mother and child. But those situations are less common than the alternative—when natural childbirth is safer.

Our Chicago birth injury lawyers hope that we reach a balanced level of C-section births throughout the country. It is not unreasonable for these surgical births to be conducted in a timely fashion when they are necessary—such as following emergency birth—and not to be conducted when a natural birth would be feasible. The consequences and risks inherent in abdominal surgeries should not be underestimated or minimized. It is medical malpractice for a patient to unknowingly suffer harm in either instance: because they had an unnecessary surgery or did not have the surgery that they needed. If you believe that you or a loved one has not received the level of care that you were entitled when it comes to these vital birth decisions, please get in touch with our Illinois injury lawyers to share your story and see how we can help.

See Our Related Blog Posts:

World’s Largest Study Underway on the Fear of Childbirth

Mothers and Children at Risk in Early Cesarean Sections

A group of medical professionals in the obstetrics and gynecology fields recently released a call to pregnant women nationwide to return to healthy natural childbirth and away from what they dubbed the “C-Section Epidemic.” The plea was made in Advanced Chiropractic Health and Wellness News. The doctors are giving free pregnancy and childbirth lectures in the hopes of addressing what they see is a rash of unnecessary C-section births.

As the doctors explain, and our Chicago birth injury lawyers have blogged about, the nation’s C-section rate is currently at an all-time high. The doctors here claim that it is now the most common surgical procedure in the country. They explain how in most states anywhere from 20-40% of all new babies are delivered via C-section instead of natural childbirth. These high C-section figures are far too high, claim the doctors, because many are unnecessary.

It was explained that many fail to understand that C-sections are major surgical procedures that comes with a wide range of complications and require much longer recovery times when compared to natural childbirth. While these procedures are seemingly done in order to prevent birth injuries for the young child, they actually may provide the involved family more harm than good. The doctors giving the presentation explain that C-sections increase the likelihood of hemorrhage, bowel injury, bladder injury, infections, and may actual compromise future fertility.

The lecturers on the topic also admitted dismay that so many doctors discourage trial pregnancies in woman who have had a prior C-Section. These births are known as VBACs. This creates a vicious cycle, they explain, whereby mothers that are forced to have their first child via C-Section often feel forced to have the rest of their children the same way. Right now only 8% of children are born vaginally after their mother had a previous C-Section. This is down from rates of VBACs that was near 30% in previous years. The American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists has claimed that VBACs are appropriate under certain circumstances. In addition, research on the subject continues to reveal that in certain cases they can be preferable for the patient, claim the group of doctors.

The doctors admit that at times, surgical deliveries are necessary. For example, it is imperative that medical professionals act in any manner necessary, especially via surgical options, when a child is in fetal distress, there is unresolved labor unrest, the child is in breech position, or if there are complications from multiple pregnancies. Yet, they maintain that there remain far too many C-Sections than are warranted by the percentage of these actual conditions.

In the end, as with all things, a balance must be sought. Our Chicago birth accident lawyers know that failure to perform C-sections in a timely fashion when necessary have very real consequences for the child. Many birth injury lawsuits have revolved around that issue. However, there is a different between necessary surgical birth and C-sections performed for no safety reasons. Medical professionals should be capable of understanding the basic difference and guiding patients as such.

In Other News: Two of our companion blogs--The Illinois Medical Malpractice Blog and Illinois Injury Lawyer Blog--were nominated for inclusion as one of the Top 25 Tort Blogs of 2011. The award is part of the LexisNexis project which seeks to feature blogs that set the standard in certain practice areas and industries. The voting to narrow down the field is currently underway, and we would love to have your vote. All you have to do is add a comment at the end of the post about the Top 25 bogs.

Please Follow This Link To Vote: Vote for Our Blog. Thanks for your support!

See Our Related Blog Posts:

World’s Largest Study Underway on the Fear of Childbirth

Mothers and Children at Risk in Early Cesarean Sections

The Detroit Free Press reported today on the conclusion of a birth injury lawsuit that some are calling the largest ever in the state. The jury in the case recently returned a verdict in favor of the plaintiff for a staggering $130 million. The trial lasted a total of three weeks, and the jury took three days to reach their verdict. The defendants in the case plan to appeal.

According to reports, the case involved problems caused by an improper vaginal delivery of a child which led to a variety of problems. The girl is now fifteen years old. When she was born the child’s mother suffered from gestational diabetes. This caused the baby to be much larger than expected. When a birthing child is too large, it is often common practice for the safety of both the mother and child to have a Cesarean section performed. Unfortunately, that did not occur in this case. Instead, the doctor induced a vaginal delivery.

The delivery led to a variety of permanent problems for the newborn. One involved party claimed that the doctors “literally crushed the life out of that little baby.” The girl received brain damage, had a broken clavicle, and now suffers from quadriplegia. The girl now requires around the clock care and will likely need that care for the rest of her life. Considering that she is expected to live into her eighties, the overall costs of the care is mind boggling. The length and overall scope of the required care is what contributed to the large jury award.

While the eye-popping jury award will likely garner all the headlines it is important for observers not to take this and similar large verdicts out of context. For one thing, these awards are extremely rare. While newspaper stories across the country will likely carry this headline for the next week, the vast majority of jury awards that are returned day in and day out are drastically lower. This is important to remember, because it is the skewed perception of consistent large verdicts that often drives members of the public to support ill-advised medical malpractice damage caps.

In addition, even on the rare occasions when large awards are doled out, they are arrived upon by clear calculations made by the involved parties. Contrary to popular belief, numbers are not plucked out of thin air. The totals are arrived at depending on the life expectancy of the involved victim, the total cost of the care they will need, and the total losses that they sustained as a result of the problems. A Chicago birth injury attorney knows that the overall costs and losses spread out over a lifetime are quite high. The jury verdicts returned in these cases reflect that. They should not be deemed an extra-large or arbitrary figure that paints the entire justice system in an unsavory light.

If you or a loved one may have been injured because of mistakes made during childbirth, please get in touch with our Illinois birthing problem lawyers. We can provide a free consultation so that you can share your story and learn how the law applies in your case.

See Our Related Blog Posts:

Family of Injured Boy Seeks Approval of $30M Award in Birth Injury Lawsuit

Doctor’s Failure to Treat Jaundice Causes Baby to Suffer Cerebral Palsy Birth Injury

Our Chicago birth injury attorneys recently read that multiple hospitals in the Miami area stated that in 2010, over half of their births were caesarian births (C-sections), as opposed to vaginal deliveries. Additionally, according to Florida Independent, this city has the highest rate of C-section deliveries in the United States. The high number of C-section births worry many doctors and other health care professionals, because many believe that C-sections should only be performed when it is medically in the best interest of the mother and baby. Examples of when it might be medically necessary is when there is a complication that makes the birth need to occur quickly in order to keep the mother and baby safe.

One of the reasons that there has been a large rise in the number of C-section births is because in terms of scheduling it is easier for both mothers and for hospitals. With C-sections, the birth is often times scheduled ahead of time (unless the C-section is because of a complication or an emergency situation) and this makes both the family and the hospital able to plan for the birth. While the ease in planning may sound like a good solution to giving birth to many doctors and expectant families, it is not a good reason to have a C-section if that is the only reason for performing the C-section instead of performing a vaginal birth. A C-section is a surgical procedure and the risk associated with surgeries are present with all C-sections, and many mothers and babies suffer complications with C-sections that would not be present with a normal vaginal delivery.

Another reason that many doctors opt for, and encourage, C-sections even when they may not be medically necessary, is that doctors often worry about the increased risk of medical malpractice and birth injury lawsuits that may arise from a long labor and natural birthing process. While there may be more time for birth related complications to arise during a prolonged labor, the risk of a potential birth injury lawsuit is not a good reason for a doctor to encourage a C-section as a birthing solution when there is no other logical reason to perform the C-section.

If your doctor suggests a C-section delivery, instead of a vaginal labor and birth, please make sure to understand the reasoning behind the suggestions, and choose one when it is medically necessary and not just for scheduling ease. C-sections are a great option when there is a complication and the baby needs to be delivered immediately, or when other complications make one necessary, but if that is not the case and it is just for the doctor to protect themselves from a possible birth injury lawsuit, undergoing surgery for no real reason may not be the best choice for the mother or the baby. All doctors and all hospitals should always place the patient and the baby’s health and safety first and foremost, and if you feel that the doctor was negligent in their decision making, please contact our Illinois personal injury attorneys to talk about whether a birth injury lawsuit should be filed against the doctor.

Our Illinois birth injury attorneys were interested to learn about an Illinois birth injury lawsuit settlement in which an Aurora family received over $15 million dollars after filing a lawsuit against the doctor who delivered the family's baby. The birth occurred seven years ago but the medical malpractice lawsuit just settled. The birth injury that the lawsuit was addressing was the result of negligence on the part of the doctor who delivered the baby and his actions left the baby with cerebral palsy and with mental retardation. Cerebral palsy is something that may occur during birth if the baby is without oxygen for too long, and is the term used to describe the conditions suffered by this lack of oxygen and that result is physical or mental developmental problems.

During delivery, the doctor attempted to use a vacuum extractor to help to deliver the baby, and continued to attempt to use this method even after the method failed him multiple times. According to About Cerebral Palsy, even though the mother and the baby were in severe distress at the time of the delivery, the doctor did not intervene or try to reduce the permanent damage to the baby and instead kept trying something that had failed multiple times before. The baby appeared to have been developing with no problems prior to during the delivery and it is very likely that had the doctor performed a C-section when the complications presented themselves, the baby would not have been born with any serious permanent birth related injuries. While the doctor did eventually perform a C-section to deliver the baby, it was not until after multiple failed attempts with the vacuum extraction device.

Because the doctor ignored the signs, the mother and baby were in distress for too long and as a result the baby was born with and will permanently have serious brain and developmental damage as a result. Treatment for these lifelong birth injuries will be very expensive and that is part of the reason that the family was asking for the amount in the lawsuit. Additionally, the amount sought by the family and the amount determined in the settlement not only includes money for the medical bills, but also compensation for all that the young boy and the family has suffered through as a result of the doctor's negligence.

Continue reading "Illinois Birth Injury Lawsuit Settles for Over $15 M" »

The number of deliveries via cesarean section is on the rise, but like any surgical procedure, there are always risks associated with this method. Our Chicago birth injury attorneys recently read an article on the HealthDay page on USNews.com in which we were surprised to learn that the number of c-sections increased 7% from 2002 to 2009. Although they are often convenient, experts warn that these procedures can be dangerous and should only be performed when necessary to protect the health and well-being of both mothers and babies.

According to the report, the rise in the number of cesareans is a result of a number of factors. For one, many mothers and physicians appreciate the convenience of knowing when the child will be delivered. There is also an increase in the number of older women giving birth and those suffering from diabetes and obesity, so physicians may choose c-sections to avoid birth injuries or other complications during delivery. The article also notes that many women may not fully understand the risks associated with cesarean surgery.

As with any surgery, there are a number of potentially serious complications associated with c-sections. In our practice, we represent mothers and children who have been injured during the birth process. Although many c-sections are planned, some mothers require emergency cesareans when complications during birth arise. This could be because the baby is not properly descending through the mother’s birth canal or a breech birth. Although when performed in these situations, a c-section is necessary and actually used as a remedy, sometimes they are delayed, in which case the child may suffer birth injuries. Our Illinois birth injury lawyers have represented clients in cases in which a physician’s failure to perform a c-section in a timely manner led to birth injuries, including a recent $6.5 million settlement for a young girl who suffers from cerebral palsy as a result of a delayed c-section.

Surgical errors and complications may occur during both planned and emergency cesareans. This can include anesthesia errors, blood clots, infection, cardiac arrest, perforated or severed bowels, or severe postpartum bleeding. Although in some cases a c-section may be a mother’s best option to minimize risk to her unborn child, due to the serious nature of these complications, it is important for women and their doctors to carefully weigh their options before deciding whether or not to perform a c-section.

Late this week Courant News published a story on a jury verdict in an untimely cesarean section case that represents one of the largest single birth injury verdicts ever. The report shares information about the suit filed by a family against their obstetrician who failed to provide them with the level of care to which they were entitled. The family alleges that their doctor waited too long to perform a cesarean section leading to serious consequences for their baby. Specifically it was argued that a timely incision to relieve the upper uterine area on the birthing mother was not performed quickly enough. As a result, there was insufficient space for a traumatic delivery, delaying the necessary cesarean section.

As often occurs when doctors wait too long to perform these deliveries, the family’s new addition was born with severe cerebral palsy. The boy will forever need close medical care. He is unable to walk, eat, or talk, needs to be fed through a tube, and will be confined to a wheelchair for life.

The jury ultimately agreed with the family in this case and determined that the doctor was negligent in his conduct. They awarded the family $58.6 million for their losses, though it remains unclear if the judge will let the total award amount stand.

Our Chicago birth attorneys have experience representing families who have suffered from similar medical mistakes. Last November we settled a case for $6.5 million on behalf of a family that went through a traumatic birthing ordeal involving an inexperienced medical resident who failed to notice that the baby’s head was too large to fit through the mother’s pelvis. The problem required the performance of a cesarean section, but the doctor’s error delayed it.

When a cesarean section was finally ordered for the birth, the anesthesiologist improperly anesthetized the mother, ultimately forcing her arms and legs to be held down while the incision was made. Following the mistakes the child suffered from cerebral palsy and will need on-going medical care for the rest of her life.

Continue reading "Birth Injury Lawsuit Ends in Record $58.6 Million Verdict" »

A birth injury lawyer secured an $8.5 million settlement for the family of a severely brain-damaged child. The Jersey Journal reported that even though the trial had already begun, attorneys reached an agreement to settle after five days of trial testimony.

According to the lawsuit, when the mother-to-be first went to the hospital, several prenatal tests were conducted. All of these tests suggested that the unborn baby was normal and healthy. A prenatal heart monitor was then attached to the mother’s abdomen to track the baby’s heart rate. Several hours later, the baby's heart rate started to drop. In fact, records showed that the unborn baby’s heart rate reached a dangerously low level of 60 beats per minute.

Although the baby’s heart rate was grave and required immediate medical attention, evidence suggested that the labor and delivery room nurse waited almost half an hour before calling the attending obstetrician. As the unborn baby continued to struggle, the obstetrician took over twenty minutes before even starting an emergency Cesarean section.

Evidence at trial showed that the unborn baby’s umbilical chord was compressed. This can cause a baby's low heart rate and can cause the fetus to be deprived of oxygen. Experts in the case claimed that as a result of the unnecessary delays by the obstetrician and the delivery room nurse, the unborn baby suffered permanent brain damage.

The child, who is now five years old, suffers from seizures, is unable to walk, and needs to be fed through a straw. The child will be in need for full-time care for his entire life. According to the terms of this birth injury settlement, $6 million was provided for the medical expenses the child will incur in the future. The parents received $2.5 million as compensation for their emotional pain and other damages.

To read more about this birth injury settlement, follow the link.

Unfortunately birth injuries are not uncommon. In early March a family received $19.2 million for their child’s birth injury. Click on the link if you wish to learn more about the family’s struggle with their child’s birth injury. Birth injuries often result in brain injury for the unborn child. If you want to learn more about brain injuries, follow the link.

Continue reading "$8.5 million settlement for family of child who suffered brain damage at birth" »

HealthBeat recently reported on the amount of cesearean sections in the past 35 years. Results show that numbers have tripled. Expectant mothers are likely now, more so than ever, to choose a c-section in advance rather than undergo a vaginal birth. In addition, according to another research study, the number of induced births has also increased. It has been reported that nearly 40% of births are electively induced – meaning that there was no medical necessity requiring the induction.

But while these numbers are growing, so are the complications attributed to each of these procedures. During induction, women are administered the drug Pitocin. Because induced labor is often painful, women are also given an epidural. Epidurals can increase the chances of a vacuum or forceps being used during delivery. Furthermore, because babies born by induced labors can often be born too early, the babies will likely be required to stay in the hospital’s neonatal care unit a lot longer than most infants.

Similarly, as addressed by the National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS): “Cesareans are associated with higher rates of surgical complications and maternal re-hospitalization as well as with complications requiring neonatal intensive care unit admission… In addition hospital charges for a Cesarean delivery are almost double those for a vaginal delivery.” Moreover, c-sections are major surgeries which require the patient to recover afterwards. This recovery can often take several weeks.

But while more and more women are choosing to undergo these pre-planned types of births, other women don’t have a choice. At times, c-sections are vital and if not done properly or efficiently, they can often lead to other birth injuries. It is extremely important for healthcare professionals to be cautious and thorough when dealing with such emergency situations in order to minimize error and avoid birth injury lawsuits. However, as our Chicago birth injury attorneys know, that is not always the case.

Continue reading "Trends and complications of cesarean sections and induced labor may lead to birth injury lawsuits" »

According to Westlaw News, a pending lawsuit on the west coast claims that hospital doctors intentionally delayed delivery of a baby after they confirmed that the baby would be born with substantial brain injuries. This birth injury lawsuit continues to allege that the hospital doctors delayed delivery in order to increase the likelihood that the baby would not survive delivery.

The unborn baby’s mother is alleging that doctors knew that her unborn baby needed to be delivered immediately and that failure to do so would result in traumatic brain damaged.

She further states that once the doctors determined that the unborn baby had in fact suffered severe brain damage, the doctors purposefully took actions to end the unborn baby’s life in order to save the hospital and the doctors from legal and financial responsibility.

Unfortunately, this pending birth injury lawsuit is not the only case where unborn babies have been affected by a doctor’s negligence. As covered in this blog recently, in one birth injury lawsuit, a newborn baby suffered from fetal hypoxia when doctors failed to order an emergency Cesarean section. In another case, a birth injury lawyer represented the family of a newborn who suffered a brain injury from severe lack of oxygen during delivery. You can read more about these incidents below.

Continue reading "Lawsuit alleges that doctors intentionally delayed delivery to increase chance of death." »

Chicago birth injury lawyers John J. Perconti and Patricia Gifford of Levin & Perconti represented a ten year old girl who suffers from cerebral palsy and mental retardation. The young girl sustained a brain injury during complications that could have been prevented during her birth.

On November 24, 2010, Levin & Perconti announced that the Advocate Lutheran General Hospital in Park Ridge, IL and a physician who failed to perform a timely Cesarean section agreed to pay a $6.5 million present cash value settlement to the injured child and her family.

Doctors failed to diagnose cephalopelvic disproportion in the pregnant mother. Physicians further failed to order an emergency Cesarean section even though they noted erratic decelerations in the fetus, a common warning sign for fetal hypoxia. Once an emergency Cesarean section was ordered, mistakes made by the anesthesiologist resulted in the nursing staff having to hold the mother down while the incision was made during the surgery.

Fortunately, both the newborn and mother survived the procedure. However, the newborn suffered from hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy, which caused the child’s cerebral palsy and mental retardation. The family plans to use the settlement to provide their daughter with the appropriate care she currently needs and the ongoing care she will have to have throughout her adult life.

Continue reading "Child with cerebral palsy receives $6.5 million birth injury settlement with Chicago hospital" »

The Chicago Sun-Times reported last month on the end of a Chicago birth injury trial. The medical malpractice lawsuit stemmed from treatment by a doctor connected to the Northwestern Memorial Physicians Group.

The malpractice occurred during the delivery of a Pilsen woman’s son in 2002. Going into the delivery, it was known that the baby was going to be large. Pre-natal care had revealed clearly that the child was of considerable size, which often presents particularly unique problems for a successful birth. The boy was ultimately born weighing 11 pounds, 5 ounces. However even though the medical staff knew that the child was large, they failed to inform the mother of the risks associated with this particularly birth. Specifically, they never warned her of the special risks posed by a vaginal birth—as opposed to a Cesarean Section.

The risks ultimately materialized during delivery. The infant boy’s shoulder got stuck on the mother’s pelvic bone. That problem was magnified when the doctor leading the birth pulled too hard on the boy’s head and neck. The force applied caused injury to his arm. Now, eight years later, the boy still does not have full function of his arm.

Continue reading "Chicago Family Awarded $3 Million Following Birth Malpractice" »

Xzavier Hyman, a four year old child from Staten Island, was recently awarded $510,000 in a Medical Malpractice action against the obstetrician-gynecologist responsible for delivering him.

Xzavier’s mother, Ms. Spicer, was going through a difficult birth so Xzavier’s doctor, Dr. Paul Heltzer, ordered the use of Pitocin, a drug which helps speed up delivery by inducing contractions, to help her along in the birthing process. Pitocin is commonly used for women who are having difficulty delivering their child. However, Dr. Heltzer made the mistake of administering the drug for too long which put stress on Xzavier’s brain, causing three or four strokes and three seizures within 10 hours of his birth.

Xzavier’s attorney’s successfully argued that Ms. Spicer was kept too long on Petocin, and her relentless contractions stressed Xzavier. Additionally, they argued that a Caesarean operation should have been performed several hours before Ms. Spicer gave vaginal birth to Xzavier. If these steps were taken, Xzavier’s injuries could have been avoided.

The delivery, and subsequent stokes and seizures, left Xzavier with permanent injuries. Xzavier still suffers from some speech and fine motor skill deficiencies, the gap in IQ between him and his peers has continued to widen, and his life expectancy was cut approximately six years.

Both Xzavier’s mother and attorney expressed joy that the verdict came down in their favor, but disappointment that the award was not higher. Many birth injury malpractice cases award damages far greater than the $510,000 that Xzavier received. Much of this is based on the ongoing medical bills that a child will face as he ages because of the injury.

Continue reading "Jury Awards Birth Injury Victim $510,000" »

It is every parent’s worst fear for their child to suffer from a traumatic experience during the course of their life. Still, due to high levels of medical negligence during birth, some parent’s fears come to fruition all too soon. That was the case of one mother who gave birth at Norwich Obstetrics and Gynecological Group Inc. under the care of Dr. John Bodin. According to the Norwich Bulletin, Dr. Bodin was sanctioned by the Connecticut Department of Public Health after an investigation found he failed to monitor a woman in labor or intervene when nurses reported the unborn child was in distress. This failure led to the child suffering brain injury and a brain hemorrhage which subsequently led to the newborns untimely death only five weeks after his birth.

The mother, who has chosen to remain anonymous, claimed in a lawsuit against Dr. Bodin and the facility, that Dr. Bodin used an excessive amount of Pitocin, a drug used to stimulate contractions, and subsequently failed to recognize signs of fetal distress or to intervene by performing a timely Cesarean Section.

Medical malpractice lawsuits are unfortunately not uncommon. According to the Connecticut Department of Public Health an OB-GYN is sued an average of 2.7 times during his career. Lawsuits can be expensive to defend, costing as much as $200,000-$300,000 per lawsuit. These high costs, and the increasing costs in medical malpractice insurance are why Dr. Bodi claims to have closed his practice.

While Dr. Bodi acts as though he has been victimized into closing his facility, it is important to remember who the real victim is in this story. It is not Dr. Bodi who’s child was lost due to the negligence of another, and although Dr. Bodi may have had to close his facility because of the high costs of his insurance (which he claims to have been about $130,000 per doctor, and would have increased because of this now pending lawsuit), perhaps next time when a mother is suffering from similar symptoms as the mother in this case, Dr. Bodi will remember the consequences of performing his duty negligently.

A jury recently awarded over $23 million to 5-year-old boy and his mother in a birth malpractice trial in Milwaukee that lasted over two weeks. The jury found the woman’s doctor negligent for the birth injury her son sustained during delivery in 2005. According to a report in the Journal Sentinel, the boy suffers from cerebral palsy as a result of the brain damage that he sustained during his delivery. The jury found the doctor negligent for failing to perform a C-section despite the woman’s prolonged labor and signs of distress. Instead of a C-section, the doctor ordered a medical resident to deliver the baby with forceps.

Most likely, the child’s brain damage was the result of hypoxia, or lack of oxygen. When complications arise during the labor and delivery process, it can cause a newborn’s oxygen supply to be cut off. When a child goes without sufficient oxygen for an extended period of time, this can lead to brain damage which can cause conditions like cerebral palsy. The National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke defines cerebral palsy as term used to describe a number of neurological disorders that affect one’s movement and coordination. The effects of cerebral palsy can range in severity, but in many instances sufferers will have to undergo lifelong medical care and treatments. In the above example, the damages will help to compensate for future medical costs as well as the loss of future potential income and pain and suffering.

To learn more about the recent birth injury verdict, follow the hyperlink.

A jury has awarded the family of a 12-year-old boy $18.5 million in a medical malpractice lawsuit against a hospital and obstetrician, according to The Star-Ledger. An emergency cesarean section became necessary for his birth back in 1998, but it was unnecessarily delayed, causing brain damage and the development of cerebral palsy. Experts testified at trial that, if the procedure would have been performed just eight minutes sooner, he would not have developed the condition.

When a fetus begins showing signs of distress, such as an irregular heartbeat, it may mean that it is not getting enough oxygen. If so, it becomes critical to deliver the baby as soon as possible, usually by performing an emergency c-section. Delays in the performance of these emergency c-sections can cause serious, permanent injuries to oxygen-deprived babies, such as brain damage and cerebral palsy. Many of these delays are not only avoidable, but caused by the negligence of doctors and hospitals.

If you believe that your child suffered a birth injury as a result of a healthcare provider’s negligence, please contact us to discuss your case. Our Illinois birth injury lawyers are here to help.

CBS 6 Albany reports this month that a $5.2 settlement was ordered in a lawsuit brought on behalf of a mother’s death during childbirth that occurred as a result of medical malpractice. Doctors cut or tore the mother’s uterine arties during a Caesarean section delivery, and this resulted in the mother hemorrhaging in the operating room and losing about 60% of her blood volume. The doctors failed to take timely action, not addressing the mother’s continued internal bleeding or repair it in surgery until more than six hours had passed. By then it was too late and the mother bled to death. The doctors were additionally found negligent in not performing the mother’s Caesarean section delivery in the morning when the mother’s labor progressed irregularly, and in not recording the mother’s vital signs when the Caesarean section delivery was eventually performed.

Maternal death ratios have increased in the United States recent years, according to Amnesty International USA. In 1987 there were 6.6 maternal deaths per 100,000 live births, but by 2006 that ratio had increased to 13.3 maternal deaths per 100,000 live births. This ratio is greater than that of 40 other countries. Furthermore, birth injury complications affecting a mother’s health occur to 1.7 million women every year in this country. Amnesty International USA attributes these maternal risks in part to inadequate staffing and quality protocols and a lack of accountability and oversight.

As the lawsuit illustrates, medical malpractice can result in serious consequences such as the preventable death of a mother during childbirth. Filing a lawsuit might be the best route to take to hold the doctors liable when this occurs. Similar to the New York lawsuit, the Illinois birth injury lawyers at Levin & Perconti received a $7.62 million verdict on behalf of a mother who bled to death after her HMO doctor disregarded the mother’s complaints of postpartum bleeding. If you believe a similar preventable tragedy has occurred to your family, please contact our Chicago birth injury attorneys.

A settlement totaling $77,418,670 was recently reached with St. John’s Riverside Hospital for the family of a three-year-old boy who developed cerebral palsy due to unnecessary delays during birth. The medical malpractice lawsuit alleged that the hospital, and the obstetrician/genecologist who delivered the baby, failed to perform an emergency c-section despite the presence of signs that indicated that the baby was suffering from oxygen deprivation. Instead, the doctor opted for a vaginal delivery, which was alleged to have been initiated almost an hour later.

Click on the following link for more information about this $77 Million cerebral palsy settlement.

A $3.35 million Euro (About $4.65 Million in US currency) settlement was reached because of a birth injury that took place. The Hospital in this case failed to get proper information including information relating to the baby’s fetal heart rate and the doctor carried out a Caesarean section too late causing the birth injury. The birth injury caused asphyxiation at birth, motor dysfunction and mild cerebral palsy. To read the entire article click here “Birth Injuries”

A lawsuit was filed in St. Clair County, IL on behalf of a baby that died due to birth injuries. The child’s grandmother filed the birth injury lawsuit against the doctor that delivered him and the hospital where he was born. The lawsuit alleges that the doctor failed to perform a cesarean or treat the baby during delivery. The baby suffered neonatal hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy during delivery and died several months later from his birth injury. Read full coverage of this Illinois medical malpractice case.

Earlier this week, a jury returned a verdict awarding $4 million in a medical malpractice lawsuit for birth injuries found to have been caused by a delayed c-section.

The injured baby’s mother had been pregnant with twins, but one died in utero. A few weeks later, doctors discovered that the surviving twin was in distress and determined that an emergency c-section was necessary. The operation was delayed for several hours, however, and the baby ended up being born with permanent brain damage that led to cerebral palsy and mental retardation. The award should help to guarantee that the child receives the necessary treatment that she will require for the rest of her life.

Read more about this delayed c-section case here.

When it comes to babies who are deprived of oxygen during birth, every second counts. Delays in the performance of c-sections can cause serious injuries to oxygen-deprived babies, such as brain damage and cerebral palsy. Hospitals and doctors can significantly reduce the length of c-section delays, however, by implementing quality improvement programs by doctors and hospitals, according to a new study published in this month’s issue of Obstetrics and Gynecology. In particular, the study found that, after 2 years of following such a program, the number of emergency c-sections that were delayed for over 30 minutes was reduced by up to 30% in some situations. These findings suggest that many devastating birth injuries could be prevented if hospitals and doctors simply implemented programs to address the delays.

Click the following link for more information about the quality improvement program study and its findings.

There are serious risks, both to the mother and her baby, when having a “natural birth” after having delivered an earlier child by c-section. The procedure, known as vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC, for short), has been shown to cause serious injuries. For instance, there is a risk of the mother suffering a uterine rupture, which can be fatal to both her and her baby. There is also a chance that the VBAC will cause the baby to suffer oxygen deprivation (or birth hypoxia), leading to brain damage and cerebral palsy. These risks are compounded by doctors’ errors such as hesitation to perform the delivery or delaying a c-section. Recognizing that the decision to proceed with a VBAC may cause these birth injuries, and potentially be grounds for pursuing a medical malpractice lawsuit, many doctors are now refusing to perform them, opting instead for another c-section delivery.

Read more about the risks of VBACS, and the difficulties of finding doctors willing to perform them, in an article by Time Magazine.

Last Friday, a jury in a medical malpractice trial awarded $4.4 million to the parents of a child who suffered a severe brain injury at birth. Three days before her scheduled induction, the mother went to the hospital with nausea and vomiting. A fetal heart monitor showed that the baby was in dire stress and in need of an emergency c-section but a nurse misread the data. This delay lead to prolonged oxygen deprivation, causing her daughter to suffer severe brain damage and later develop cerebral palsy. She died a year ago, at the age of less than 4 and a half, of complications from the disorder.

Read more about this birth injury trial here.

The umbilical cord delivers oxygen-rich blood to the fetus. During labor, the cord can become stretched or compressed, interrupting this vital flow. Umbilical cord compression is a relatively common condition, occurring about once every ten deliveries, and often transpires when the cord becomes caught between the baby’s head and the mother’s pelvic bone or when it becomes wrapped around the baby’s neck. Once this happens, the blood flow is interrupted and the level of oxygen that the baby receives begins to decrease. If the baby is deprived of oxygen for a significant amount of time, a condition called hypoxia, it can develop severe injuries including brain damage, cerebral palsy, blindness, deafness, or developmental delays. Fortunately, this deprivation is detectable. The diminished blood flow can cause short and sudden decreases in the baby’s heart rate, which become visible on a fetal heart rate monitor. Often times, when this is detected, simply administered oxygen to the woman to increase the amount available to the baby is sufficient. In some cases, however, if the baby’s oxygen level is extremely low or if it begins showing other signs of distress, it is necessary to deliver the baby as soon as possible and the doctor may have to perform an emergency c-section. Under these circumstances, time is essential. Mistakes and carelessness by doctors and nurses that delay the operation amount to medical malpractice and can cause permanent brain damage to the baby.

A jury awarded a child with cerebral palsy $20.5 million in a medical malpractice lawsuit that was filed as a result of mistakes that occurred at the time of the child’s birth. The case involved the June 2001 birth of a boy who has been diagnosed with cerebral palsy. The family alleged that the disability was caused by damage to the brain during a four hour delay in his delivery. The medical malpractice lawsuit states that after the mother arrived at the Community Medical Center she was hooked up to a fetal monitoring system which demonstrated that the baby was in distress, yet the doctor did not arrive to deliver the child for approximately two hours, and even after his arrival, attempts were made to induce labor instead of doing an emergency caesarean section. Cerebral palsy is a motor disability which is caused by brain damage that can occur before, during or immediately after birth. The family successfully argued that the doctor and hospital’s failure to do an immediate c-section resulted in a lack of oxygen to the baby’s brain, which resulted in the permanent brain damage. Cerebral palsy is a motor disability which is caused by brain damage that can occur before, during or immediately after birth. The family was able to successfully argue that the doctor and hospital’s failure to do an immediate c-section resulted in a lack of oxygen to the baby’s brain, which resulted in the permanent brain damage. The boy is now 7 years old, requires 24 hour care, is unable to use his hands, is mentally retarded, blind and functions at the level of a 9 month old. The cerebral palsy malpractice lawsuit awarded the family $2 million for past expenses incurred by the parents and $18.5 million for the child’s pain and suffering, lost earning capacity and future medical expenses. To read the full story, click here.

A jury found a hospital liable for medical malpractice and awarded $4.25 million to the family of a girl who, after a traumatic birth, was born with Cerebral Palsy and brain damage. The baby’s heart rate began to drop while the mother was lying in a hospital bed but the doctor had gone home for dinner. By the time another doctor arrived and performed an emergency Cesarean Section, the baby had been deprived of oxygen for 20 minutes.

The jury found that the hospital ignored signs of fetal distress, failed to notify a doctor in time to perform a timely emergency C-Section, and that this delay caused the child’s injuries.

The jury awarded compensation for past and future medical expenses, lost future earnings and pain and suffering.

For the full story, click here.